Allahabad High Court Dismisses Petition of Married Woman in Live-In Relationship Seeking Protection

The Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition filed by a couple in a live-in relationship seeking protection from the woman’s husband. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2000 on the petitioners, emphasizing that it cannot protect relationships not supported by law, as granting protection to such relationships would create chaos in society.

Key Points:

1. Background: The petition was filed by a Muslim woman and her Hindu live-in partner seeking protection from the woman’s husband, alleging threats and interference in their relationship.
2. Petitioner’s Contentions: The petitioners argued that the woman faced abuse from her husband, prompting her to leave him and start a live-in relationship with the second petitioner. They sought protection from interference in their relationship.
3. Respondent’s Argument: The respondent countered that the woman was still legally married to her husband and had not obtained a divorce decree. They argued that her relationship with the second petitioner constituted adultery and could not be protected by law.
4. Court’s Observations: The court noted the absence of a divorce decree and stated that the woman, being legally wedded to her husband, was living in adultery with the second petitioner. It emphasized that the court cannot protect relationships not supported by law, as doing so would lead to societal chaos.
5. Court’s Decision: The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioners were not entitled to protection. Additionally, it imposed a cost of Rs. 2000 on the petitioners.

The court dismissed the petition and imposed a cost of Rs. 2000 on the petitioners.

Case Title: Pinki and Anr. vs State of U.P and Ors.

Coram: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Renu Agarwal

Case No.: WRIT – C No. – 1579 of 2024

Advocate for the Petitioner: Lavkush Kumar Bhatt

Advocate for the Respondent: C.S.C.

Conclusion: The Allahabad High Court’s decision underscores the principle that the court cannot protect relationships deemed illegal under the law. By dismissing the petition and imposing a cost on the petitioners, the court reaffirmed the importance of upholding legal norms in society.