Categories: JUDGMENT

Bombay High Court: Pregnant Minor Cannot Be Denied Medical Aid Without Police Complaint

The Bombay High Court ruled that a pregnant minor in a consensual relationship cannot be denied medical treatment solely due to the absence of a police complaint. Upholding the minor’s fundamental right to medical care under Article 21 of the Constitution, the court emphasized that no individual should be deprived of medical assistance in a civilized society.

Key Points:

  • A mother approached the High Court to secure the medical rights of her 17-year-old daughter, who was seven months pregnant from a consensual relationship. They faced denial of medical treatment at clinics and hospitals without a police complaint.
  • The petitioner argued that her daughter’s fundamental right to medical care must be upheld, as she did not intend to file a police complaint. They planned to give the child up for adoption.
  • The State Counsel proposed that the minor could receive medical treatment at a specific hospital without disclosing her identity, provided the petitioner submitted an ‘Emergency Police Report’ stating their decision not to file a complaint.
  • The court allowed the submission of the Emergency Police Report in a sealed cover and emphasized the minor’s entitlement to medical treatment under Article 21, despite the absence of a police complaint.
  • Granting medical aid is a fundamental aspect of the right to life and livelihood guaranteed under Article 21, and no individual should be denied medical treatment in a civilized society.
  • The court directed the hospital to provide medical treatment to the minor under the identification ‘ABC’ without insisting on a police complaint. The minor was entitled to medical care throughout her pregnancy and post-maternity period.

Case Details:

  • Case Title: XYZ vs. State of Maharashtra
  • Case No.: Writ Petition (L) No. 12243 of 2024
  • Citation: 2024 Latest Caselaw 2 Bom
  • Coram: Justice GS Kulkarni and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
  • Advocates for the Petitioner: Mr. Nigel Quraishy with Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh
  • Advocates for the Respondent: Smt. P. H. Kantharia, GP with Smt. Pooja Patil, AGP

 If you like this law news, share it with a friend!

Ashutosh Dubey

legal journalist,Public Affair Advisor AND Founding Editor - kanishksocialmedia-BROADCASTING MEDIA PRODUCTION COMPANY,LEGAL PUBLISHER

Recent Posts

Tesla Stock Drops After Q4 Delivery Miss and First Annual Sales Decline

Keywords: Tesla stock, Q4 delivery miss, TSLA, yearly sales decline, electric vehicles, Tesla deliveries, stock…

4 weeks ago

Supreme Court Reopens for 2025; CJI Sanjiv Khanna Wishes Lawyers and Litigants a Happy New Year

Keywords: Supreme Court, CJI Sanjiv Khanna, new year 2025, winter vacation, urgent listing, email system,…

4 weeks ago

94% of Indian Youth Feel Impacted by Climate Change: Survey

Keywords: Indian youth, climate change, environment, climate impact survey, environmental awareness, India climate crisis, youth…

4 weeks ago

Global Industrial Emissions: Why the Sector Is Lagging in Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation

Keywords: industrial emissions, energy efficiency, decarbonisation, manufacturing sector, greenhouse gas emissions, fuel combustion, global warming,…

4 weeks ago

Chennai Court Sentences Stalker to Death for Murdering College Student

Keywords: Chennai Court, death sentence, Sathya murder case, stalking, IPC 302, Mahila Court, CB-CID, victim…

1 month ago

2024 Poised to Be the Hottest Year Ever, Warns WMO

Keywords: 2024 hottest year, WMO report, climate change, dangerous heat, global warming, human health risks,…

1 month ago