The contentious tweet by Grover, posted on March 12, accused SBI chairmen of being “petty people” and hinted at underlying issues within the organization. The court expressed disapproval of such statements, particularly considering their potential impact on BharatPe’s credibility.In addition to the tweet controversy, Grover had previously written to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), urging the regulator to investigate BharatPe’s shareholding. In his letter addressed to RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das, Grover alleged that BharatPe had engaged in fraudulent practices by reappointing Bhavik Koladiya, who had previously been convicted of wire fraud in the US.Grover raised concerns about whether BharatPe’s board and investors had strategically manipulated Koladiya’s shares to facilitate his return to the company. This move, according to Grover, constituted a deliberate attempt to deceive the central bank.The High Court’s warning to Grover underscores the importance of exercising caution and restraint in making public statements, especially when they have the potential to harm a company’s reputation. Grover’s actions, both on social media and in his communication with regulatory authorities, highlight the complexities and challenges facing corporate governance and transparency in the fintech sector.As Grover faces legal scrutiny and regulatory investigations, the Delhi High Court’s directive serves as a reminder of the legal obligations and responsibilities that accompany executive positions in corporate entities. Grover’s compliance with the court’s orders will be closely monitored as the situation unfolds.