On Tuesday, former Chief Justice of the Patna High Court, L Narasimha Reddy, withdrew from the one-man Commission of Inquiry established by the Telangana government. The commission was set up to investigate alleged irregularities in the power sector during the tenure of former Telangana Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao.
The withdrawal came during a Supreme Court hearing on a plea filed by Rao, who alleged bias against Justice Reddy. The counsel for Justice (retd) Reddy informed the Supreme Court that Reddy did not wish to remain part of the commission.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra took note of this submission. The court permitted the Congress-led state government to appoint a substitute for Justice Reddy in the Commission of Inquiry.
The plea from the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader, K Chandrasekhar Rao, was influenced by Justice Reddy’s actions. Rao’s counsel argued that Justice Reddy had addressed a press conference where he made remarks on the merits of the charges against Rao without conducting an inquiry, thereby demonstrating bias.
Previously, the Telangana High Court had dismissed a writ petition filed by Rao on July 1, seeking to declare the constitution of the Commission of Inquiry illegal. The commission was established to investigate the correctness and propriety of decisions made by the previous dispensation regarding power procurement from Chhattisgarh by Telangana power distribution companies, as well as the construction of the Bhadradri Thermal Power Plant at Manuguru and the Yadadri Thermal Plant at Damarcherla by TS GENCO.
In his plea, K Chandrasekhar Rao sought to have the Telangana government’s order constituting the Commission of Inquiry declared illegal. He also challenged the continuation of Justice (retd) L Narasimha Reddy as the head of the commission.
The Supreme Court’s acknowledgment of Justice Reddy’s withdrawal and the direction to the state government to appoint a new head for the commission brings a significant turn in the investigation process. The decision reflects the court’s commitment to ensuring an unbiased and fair inquiry into the alleged irregularities in Telangana’s power sector.
For ongoing updates and detailed coverage of legal and governance issues, visit Kanishk Social Media. If you found this article informative, please share it with others interested in legal and governance developments.
Keywords: Tesla stock, Q4 delivery miss, TSLA, yearly sales decline, electric vehicles, Tesla deliveries, stock…
Keywords: Supreme Court, CJI Sanjiv Khanna, new year 2025, winter vacation, urgent listing, email system,…
Keywords: Indian youth, climate change, environment, climate impact survey, environmental awareness, India climate crisis, youth…
Keywords: industrial emissions, energy efficiency, decarbonisation, manufacturing sector, greenhouse gas emissions, fuel combustion, global warming,…
Keywords: Chennai Court, death sentence, Sathya murder case, stalking, IPC 302, Mahila Court, CB-CID, victim…
Keywords: 2024 hottest year, WMO report, climate change, dangerous heat, global warming, human health risks,…