Categories: LAW AND ORDER

Himachal Pradesh High Court Lays Down Principles for Quashing Criminal Proceedings in Non-Compoundable Sexual Offences Based on Compromise

The Himachal Pradesh High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings related to a rape case, considering the bitterness that led to the filing of the FIR and the subsequent marriage between the accused and the victim, who were in a live-in relationship. The court, led by Justice Ranjan Sharma, elucidated principles for handling pleas seeking to quash criminal proceedings involving non-compoundable sexual offences based on compromise.

Key Points:

  • The petitioner sought the quashing of offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, citing a live-in relationship with the victim, marriage prior to the FIR registration, and an amicable settlement facilitated by family intervention.
  • Both the complainant and the victim sought to set aside the FIR and criminal proceedings to prevent bitterness and enmity.
  • The court acknowledged the peculiar facts of the case and invoked its inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC to secure the ends of justice.
  • It referred to Supreme Court precedents and laid down principles, emphasizing that the power to quash under Section 482 extends to non-compoundable offences and should be exercised judiciously.
  • Serious offences like rape and murder cannot be quashed solely based on settlement, while offences of a civil nature may warrant quashing.
  • The court stressed that the decision to quash criminal proceedings should consider the well-being of the victim and the possibility of conviction.
  • In this case, continuing proceedings would serve no purpose and may harm the parties involved, leading to bitterness and societal repercussions.
  • Therefore, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside the FIR and criminal proceedings to prevent further harm to the victim and her family.

Case Details:

  • Case Title: X vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
  • Case No.: Cr.MMO No.171 of 2024
  • Citation: 2024 Latest Caselaw 1 HP
  • Coram: Justice Ranjan Sharma
  • Advocates for the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Pathak and Mr. Harsh Shroal
  • Advocates for the Respondent: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General

 If you like this law news, share it with a friend!

Ashutosh Dubey

legal journalist,Public Affair Advisor AND Founding Editor - kanishksocialmedia-BROADCASTING MEDIA PRODUCTION COMPANY,LEGAL PUBLISHER

Recent Posts

Tesla Stock Drops After Q4 Delivery Miss and First Annual Sales Decline

Keywords: Tesla stock, Q4 delivery miss, TSLA, yearly sales decline, electric vehicles, Tesla deliveries, stock…

4 weeks ago

Supreme Court Reopens for 2025; CJI Sanjiv Khanna Wishes Lawyers and Litigants a Happy New Year

Keywords: Supreme Court, CJI Sanjiv Khanna, new year 2025, winter vacation, urgent listing, email system,…

4 weeks ago

94% of Indian Youth Feel Impacted by Climate Change: Survey

Keywords: Indian youth, climate change, environment, climate impact survey, environmental awareness, India climate crisis, youth…

4 weeks ago

Global Industrial Emissions: Why the Sector Is Lagging in Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation

Keywords: industrial emissions, energy efficiency, decarbonisation, manufacturing sector, greenhouse gas emissions, fuel combustion, global warming,…

4 weeks ago

Chennai Court Sentences Stalker to Death for Murdering College Student

Keywords: Chennai Court, death sentence, Sathya murder case, stalking, IPC 302, Mahila Court, CB-CID, victim…

1 month ago

2024 Poised to Be the Hottest Year Ever, Warns WMO

Keywords: 2024 hottest year, WMO report, climate change, dangerous heat, global warming, human health risks,…

1 month ago