NCLAT Rules on Financial Creditor’s Rights Against Personal Guarantors in Insolvency Cases

In a recent judgment, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has provided clarity on the extent of financial creditors’ rights against personal guarantors in insolvency cases. The ruling, delivered in the case of Vikas Aggarwal v. Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited & Ors., sheds light on the intricate balance between debt resolution, personal guarantees, and the interests of all stakeholders involved.

The crux of the matter revolved around the approval of a resolution plan by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which allowed financial creditors to pursue legal remedies against the personal guarantors of the corporate debtor. The appellants contested this decision, arguing that since the entire debt owed by the corporate debtor was assigned to a special purpose vehicle (SPV), there could not be any concept of “Excluded Rights” allowing recourse against personal guarantors.

However, the NCLAT, after careful consideration, upheld the NCLT’s order, emphasizing that the intent of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is primarily for the resolution of the corporate debtor and not the personal guarantors. The tribunal underscored the duty of personal guarantors to abide by the terms of the approved resolution plan, including provisions allowing financial creditors to pursue legal remedies against them.

Furthermore, the NCLAT highlighted the importance of extinguishing the personal guarantors’ right of subrogation in insolvency cases, emphasizing that any departure from this principle would have adverse effects on the revival of corporate debtors, the interests of financial creditors, and the national economy at large.

The judgment clarifies that the resolution of debts under a resolution plan does not equate to full satisfaction of debts payable to creditors. Financial creditors retain the right to proceed against personal guarantors to recover outstanding debts, ensuring that the interests of all parties involved are duly protected.

The decision of the NCLAT underscores the significance of upholding the principles of the IBC in insolvency proceedings, maintaining a delicate balance between debt resolution and the rights of creditors and guarantors. As stakeholders navigate the complexities of insolvency cases, the ruling provides valuable guidance on the legal framework governing financial transactions and debt resolution in the corporate landscape.

If you like this law news, share it with a friend!