Keywords: Supreme Court, e-Courts Project, Tribunals, National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG), Armed Forces Tribunal, National Green Tribunal, Digital Infrastructure, Judiciary
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking the inclusion of various tribunals in the e-courts project. The plea aimed to upgrade the digital infrastructure of quasi-judicial bodies such as the Armed Forces Tribunal and the National Green Tribunal by integrating them into the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG).
The e-courts project is a flagship initiative aimed at enhancing the digital infrastructure of courts across the country. It seeks to improve efficiency, transparency, and accessibility within the judiciary by leveraging information and communication technology (ICT). The project is closely monitored and funded by the Department of Justice under the Ministry of Law and Justice.
The PIL argued that including tribunals in the e-courts project would streamline judicial processes, ensure better case management, and enhance the transparency of quasi-judicial bodies. By becoming part of the NJDG, these tribunals would benefit from a centralized digital system that facilitates real-time tracking of case status and judicial data.
The Apex Court, however, refused to entertain the plea. The bench expressed its unwillingness to expand the scope of the e-courts project to include tribunals at this stage. The court’s decision underscores the need to focus on the existing framework of the project, which primarily targets the formal judiciary system.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to include tribunals in the e-courts project means that these quasi-judicial bodies will continue to operate without the advanced digital infrastructure that courts under the NJDG enjoy. This decision highlights the challenges in uniformly upgrading the judicial and quasi-judicial digital frameworks across the country.
While the e-courts project continues to modernize the judiciary, the exclusion of tribunals from this initiative reflects the complexities involved in implementing such extensive digital reforms. The judiciary’s cautious approach ensures that the existing digital infrastructure is robust and effective before expanding its scope.
For ongoing updates and detailed coverage of judicial developments and other strategic matters, visit Kanishk Social Media. If you found this article informative, please share it with others interested in legal and social justice issues.
Keywords: Tesla stock, Q4 delivery miss, TSLA, yearly sales decline, electric vehicles, Tesla deliveries, stock…
Keywords: Supreme Court, CJI Sanjiv Khanna, new year 2025, winter vacation, urgent listing, email system,…
Keywords: Indian youth, climate change, environment, climate impact survey, environmental awareness, India climate crisis, youth…
Keywords: industrial emissions, energy efficiency, decarbonisation, manufacturing sector, greenhouse gas emissions, fuel combustion, global warming,…
Keywords: Chennai Court, death sentence, Sathya murder case, stalking, IPC 302, Mahila Court, CB-CID, victim…
Keywords: 2024 hottest year, WMO report, climate change, dangerous heat, global warming, human health risks,…