Categories: LAW AND ORDER

Supreme Court Dismisses Pleas Challenging Appointment of Election Commissioners, Cites Risk of Constitutional Breakdown

In a crucial verdict, the Supreme Court has rejected petitions challenging the appointment of election commissioners under a 2023 law, warning that interfering with the selection process could lead to chaos and a virtual constitutional breakdown. A bench comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta dismissed the pleas against the appointment of Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu as election commissioners, emphasizing the need to uphold the sanctity of the electoral process ahead of the 18th general election for the Lok Sabha.

The court expressed concerns about the selection procedure for election commissioners, calling for full disclosure of candidate details and a fair deliberation among the selection panel members. However, it refrained from passing interim orders or directions, noting the urgency of maintaining the election schedule and avoiding disruptions that could arise from judicial intervention.

Highlighting the importance of maintaining a balance and check within the Election Commission, the court underscored the necessity of plurality in the appointment of election commissioners, as enshrined in Article 324 of the Constitution. It emphasized that the presence of two more ECs would enhance balance and efficiency within the Commission.

The bench clarified that its observations in the order were tentative and subject to the ongoing legal proceedings. It reiterated the principle of judicial restraint in matters involving the constitutionality of laws, emphasizing that suspension of legislation pending consideration is an exception rather than the rule.

Referring to a 2023 verdict of the top court regarding appointments of the chief election commissioner and ECs, the bench noted that the court had intervened in the absence of any legislation on the matter. It emphasized that courts do not suspend statutory provisions unless eminently necessary to address a crisis situation and maintain public order.

The court dismissed requests for fresh selection of election commissioners with the Chief Justice of India as a member of the selection committee, stating that such action would be impermissible without declaring the relevant provisions of the 2023 law unconstitutional.

The order was delivered on a batch of petitions, including those filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur and NGO Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), challenging the validity of the 2023 law and seeking a stay on the appointment of new ECs.

If you like this law news, share it with a friend!

Ashutosh Dubey

legal journalist,Public Affair Advisor AND Founding Editor - kanishksocialmedia-BROADCASTING MEDIA PRODUCTION COMPANY,LEGAL PUBLISHER

Recent Posts

Tesla Stock Drops After Q4 Delivery Miss and First Annual Sales Decline

Keywords: Tesla stock, Q4 delivery miss, TSLA, yearly sales decline, electric vehicles, Tesla deliveries, stock…

4 weeks ago

Supreme Court Reopens for 2025; CJI Sanjiv Khanna Wishes Lawyers and Litigants a Happy New Year

Keywords: Supreme Court, CJI Sanjiv Khanna, new year 2025, winter vacation, urgent listing, email system,…

4 weeks ago

94% of Indian Youth Feel Impacted by Climate Change: Survey

Keywords: Indian youth, climate change, environment, climate impact survey, environmental awareness, India climate crisis, youth…

4 weeks ago

Global Industrial Emissions: Why the Sector Is Lagging in Energy Efficiency and Decarbonisation

Keywords: industrial emissions, energy efficiency, decarbonisation, manufacturing sector, greenhouse gas emissions, fuel combustion, global warming,…

4 weeks ago

Chennai Court Sentences Stalker to Death for Murdering College Student

Keywords: Chennai Court, death sentence, Sathya murder case, stalking, IPC 302, Mahila Court, CB-CID, victim…

1 month ago

2024 Poised to Be the Hottest Year Ever, Warns WMO

Keywords: 2024 hottest year, WMO report, climate change, dangerous heat, global warming, human health risks,…

1 month ago