Supreme Court Seeks Centre’s Response Within 3 Weeks on Stay Pleas for Citizenship Amendment Rules 2024

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to respond within three weeks to applications seeking a stay on the implementation of the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024. The bench, led by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, scheduled the matter for further hearing on April 9. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, requested four weeks to file a reply to the 20 applications. These pleas aim to halt the Rules until the apex court resolves petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019.

Key Points:

1. Court’s Directive: The Supreme Court has instructed the Centre to provide a response within three weeks to requests seeking a stay on the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024.
2. Next Hearing: The matter has been scheduled for resumed hearing on April 9, indicating the urgency of the issue.
3. Solicitor General’s Request: Tushar Mehta, the Solicitor General representing the Centre, requested a four-week period to file a reply to the 20 applications seeking a stay on the Rules.
4. Purpose of Stay Pleas: The applications seek to suspend the implementation of the Rules until the Supreme Court resolves petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019.
5. Centre’s Assertion: Mehta emphasized that the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019, does not revoke the citizenship of any individual, defending the law’s provisions.
6. Notification of Rules: The Centre had notified the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024, on March 11, clearing the path for the implementation of the controversial Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s directive to the Centre underscores the judicial scrutiny surrounding the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024, amid ongoing legal challenges to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. The court’s decision to seek the Centre’s response within three weeks reflects the importance of addressing concerns raised by petitioners regarding the implementation of the contentious law and its associated rules.

 If you like this law news, share it with a friend!